| The FSSAI Notice of 25 February,  2011 demanded a strict compliance as per food and safety and standards  authority directives dated 2 December 2010. This included imported package  foodstuff, specified various requirements that included importer’s name, weight  of the product, month of manufacture, declaration of Best Before date of month  on the package, nutritional information   and declaration of whether it is ‘vegetarian’ or ‘non-vegetarian’ had  been made mandatory.
       With immediate effect, all such items which fall in Chapter  22 (wine which falls under chapter 2204 is also under this notice) will require  for any imports, a required lab test before Custom allows to clear the goods  from the Port. This is applicable in all ports within India, whether it is for  home consumption or meant for Re-Export. Chapter 2204 - 2208, which includes  all form of alcohol, wines, beers, port & sherries & hard spirits are  all under the purview of the FSSAI henceforth.  ‘The implementation has been put in force almost 10 days  back,’ says Debjit Dasgupta, Secretary of the Delhi Foreign Liquor Association,  formed last year. A couple of importers whose shipments landed at the port  during this week in Delhi have been running from pillar to post, trying to get  the material released at least for the current shipments.  Unless the procedure is streamlined, it spells trouble for  importers and the final consumer alike. Not only does the cost go up  marginally- every sample-even if it is a case of wine, must be sampled and  Rs.3000 deposited; the procedure may take 7-10 days before the sample is  released and if the department gets greedy, it might mean further addition to  the speed-money costs. Every sample means 2 bottles of the consignment. This  might be ok for the plonk being imported for the diplomats wearing boots on  their leggs but quality wines are expensive. Surprisingly, the customs duty has  to be paid first on the two bottles that would be supposedly thrown into the  sink by the testing authority!! Debjit agrees that the procedure ought to be streamlined.  ‘The authorities must understand that when it comes to wine, a container might  end up lying at the Port for more than 10 days to get the lab report. This will  deteriorate the quality of the wines, because of temperature and poor storage.  Secondly, on a mid to high- end wines, where importers only brings in a few  bottles, the viability factor of giving 2 bottles minimum as samples on which  the importer also has to pay custom duty, remains a big question mark’ He  further adds, ‘mostly, these kind of wines are for duty free outlets &  still if hotels insists for those brands, the importer would be obliged to add  these expenses to his cost of the product & the consumer will have to shell  out more money. There seems to be a ray of hope though, as FSSAI seems to be  very co-operative and understanding. But they seem to have their hands tied as  they normally deal with water, fruits and several products where it is not  critical and that expensive to take the samples. ‘We have discussed this matter  with the concerned authority in FSSAI & they were very cooperative &  have given us a positive hearing. They want us to make a proper representation  in this matter placing all facts before them, so that they can discuss the  issue internally come up with a policy which will help the importers to still  continue with premium quality wines with less hassles.’ No body can deny that the proper inward  inspection is necessary even for wines. One is reminded of the fairly recent  case of the US Alcohol  and Tobacco Tax and Trade Bureau (TTB) refusing to release the shipments of  Brunello di Montalcino as it felt that the grapes were not as per the  regulations. Recent bans in import of dairy products from China or nuclear  affected food products from Japan are all examples of a body like FSSAI  controlling the quality of food products through sampling. What is important to  know how pragmatic they are. Perhaps, they should ask for the reports from  recognized foreign labs  and accept them  if they are made out in English and conduct random checks. If the report is  found to be incorrect, they could blacklist the producer or the importer for a  few months. What is also important is that the importers need to come together  under the common umbrella and try to find a practical solution which should be  in the interest of the consumer.  Subhash Arora |